2024年3月4日星期一

记忆偏差——看日剧《为了N》有感 (2024)


又一次记忆偏差?太让人沮丧了!

​距离上次记忆偏差还记忆犹新,学霸们为是“天降大任于斯人”还是“是人”争论不休,我也明明记得是斯人,老师翻出来的课本却是“是人”,太邪门了。

​最近追了部日剧--为了N,好看!虽然有些地方经不起推敲,明明一部电影的体量,偏偏拖成了10集;明明已经猜到结局,却仍然挡不住它的好看,相当神奇。
​不过最令我迷茫的是,我的记忆里明明记得有这样一部类似的电影,情节是一样的,但是却是部电影,演员也不一样,弟弟明明是小孩子,不是teenager. 可是我无论怎么查,却没看到由这小说改编的电影,唯一找得到的就是王思聪买了它的版权要拍电影。。。去油管微信一通乱找也没找到有关它电影的历史纪录。。。太邪门了,难道我的记忆又骗了我?!
现在我开始怀疑:
  • 要不我就是看了小说,自己脑补的场景
  • 要不就是我看了某些YouTuber的评论,然后几个电影揉搓在一起导致的记忆混乱
要不怎么解释这凭空消失的电影呢?
真是太诡异了!

还有另外一个记忆偏差:
火娃发朋友圈说Dune 2周末上映,他觉得2 比1好看。
我觉得1挺好看的,当初看完,还去网上搜了一下它的相关知识。
为了看了2,我觉得拉着70同学再看一遍1 (70同学是第一次看)。
可是看着看着我就郁闷了,除了偶然几个场景有些许记忆外,其他的怎么我一点记忆都没有呀,简直就像第一次看一样?!!
然后看着看着70同学问我:你怎么会喜欢看节奏这么慢的电影?
我?
我也有点郁闷了,好像没有第一次看时觉得那么好看了嘛!是有点慢哦。估计当时是被各种新奇的点给吸引住了,没想到电影的故事没有小说那么丰富(虽然我也没看过小说,可是看网上的介绍,小说的故事当然要丰富许多,毕竟是6本书的体量呢)!

哎,看来这只说明了一个问题——我的记忆越来越差了嘛!!💀💀

说回电视剧《为了N》,看见警察叔叔时,我还没想起他是谁。可是看着看着,忽然想起网上说这部戏是三浦友和演的!哦!原来警察叔叔就是三浦友和呀?!男神三浦友和呀?!!哎呀,完全没认出来嘛!不过男神到了这把年纪,还是比其他人好看呀!

2023年4月15日星期六

翻车的煎汤圆 (2023)

 

家里冰箱不是坏了吗,不得已把本来打算留到明年元宵节吃的汤圆拿出来吃。搞搞新意思,煎汤圆吧!
​哇塞!大型翻车现场呀!😅😅

-.我们自己作的.-

-.别人作的.-

​For the record,黑色的不是炒焦了,是黑芝麻被气爆了的吐血之作[奸笑][奸笑]

以后还是乖乖煮汤圆比较好😌😌

唉,人家的悲喜真是不相通的,大家花式点赞,没事,为博你们红颜/蓝颜一笑!总结了一下:水放多了,而且我们的汤圆是小个头的,人家的汤圆肥肥胖胖的。

​还有,这个不是我要卖的关子,不是下集。别等了,散了吧。。。



2023年4月14日星期五

繁忙的一天

 昨天从早到晚忙了好几件大事,累却也挺开心的。

​上班前,帮妈妈跑了几趟腿。差点做了冤大头,付了两次款。最后错有错着,成功省了30+刀🔪。

​上班像打架一样,被3个PM围堵,真是很想发脾气。最后我情商高,选择完全无视他们,我的世界顿时平静下来🙈🙉🙊

​中午趁着午饭,去寄妈妈的美签申请。上一次的10年签也用过几次,不算太差。

​回来继续工作四处救火,心里默念!不要随便骂PM!🤐🤐不要随便骂PM!🤦🤦

​家里的冰箱坏了,70同学先找了个上门维修的,看了2分钟,说一句他们不能电焊,没法修,我们就不见了100多刀🔪!强盗!强盗!70又打了好几个电话,都说要先诊断再决定能不能修,又想骗我们100刀🔪!

​70同学很不开心,于是我们决定不修了,买新的!一下班就跑去看冰箱,遇到一个印度老爷爷,很少见到如此不夸夸其谈的印裔(又政治不正确了),非常nice, 不hard sale, 还想着各种办法给我们找折扣😁😁 。Home Depot正好做promotion, 不收运费,不收回收旧冰箱费!老爷爷还给我们省了100刀🔪,正好把今天被骗的补回大部分。老爷爷70岁了,还健步如飞,思路清晰!必须给他写封表扬信,把最近新学的花式夸人大法施展一下,给个5星好评!



冰箱是买了,还要等于4天才能送货。哎,真的很怀念中国生活的各种便利呀!😭😭

​今天还干了件重要的事情,我和70都很开心,先卖个关子,假装很神秘的样子。🤦🤦

2023年2月9日星期四

看笑果2023年北美巡演

昨晚终于看到了笑果在多伦多的演出,笑到眼泪都流出来了。线下果然比线上精彩,没有网络警察,没有上价值,梗也更大胆。听懂了95%的梗,还给旁边的脱口秀小白羔羊羊科普梗,人艰不拆呀!毛豆小鹿一如既往的强,航哥给了不少惊喜,好好笑。​同去的小伙伴也笑惨了,包括“笑点很高”的羔羊羊。

​现场不让用手机,一进门就放进个小口袋里。大意了,别看它人畜无害的样子,放进去手机就再出不来了,班长给打电话都完全没法听。

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

​据说现场有3000多观众,应该有8、9成的入座率了。第一次在多伦多看到这么多华人[偷笑]这是北美巡演的最后一场了,最可惜的是万人迷杨笠没来,认识的人喜欢看脱口秀的都想看她,估计她的线下一定更大胆更好玩,可惜了。


-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.最喜欢毛豆, from来自笑果工厂.-

-.最喜欢毛豆, from来自笑果工厂.-

-.航哥线下很有惊喜, from来自笑果工厂.-

-.航哥线下很有惊喜, from来自笑果工厂.-

-.小鹿一如既往的强, from来自笑果工厂.-

-.李诞这位中年油腻大叔也很招人喜爱, from来自笑果工厂.-

-.没有很强的段子,可是我却不烦他, from来自笑果工厂.-

-.豆豆是今晚的司仪, from来自笑果工厂.-

-.坐飞机那段还是挺好笑的, from笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

​中场抽了5个幸运儿可以带1-2个朋友去后台跟演员们合影,我们没抽到😒😒

​大家笑开心了,约会下次继续看😊😊

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

-.来自笑果工厂.-

自从上次摆乌龙后,我都有心理阴影了,隔三差五就搜搜我的邮箱有没有改期取消演出的邮件,还不放心,再跑到Ticketmaster搜搜xiaoguo看看show还在不?小伙伴说你太给力了,下次带得你抢票!哎。。。看来伤害还不够深,咋没长记性呢?!🤣🤣

2023年1月22日星期日

乌龙大了 (2023)

哎,今天乌龙大了,简直算得上乌龙大记事,非得要发朋友圈纪念一下。

​去年班长发朋友圈问有谁要去看笑果在多伦多的表演,我和大仙、羔羊都报名参加,当时我还积极地帮大家抢票。我非常给力的,为大家抢下了1月19的4张票。


​和同学们约好在火车站集合,先吃个饭,然后再愉快去看表演。

​大家太久没见了,有几年了吧,以至于聊得太开心。幸亏我还人间清醒,一看表都7点半了,连忙拉着大家往剧院赶。

​大家一起有说有笑地来到剧院门前,班长嘀咕了一下:这也太小众了吧,怎么门口乌灯黑火的呀,门都打不开。。。

​大家连忙点头同意--真的很小众![无语][无语]

​正当大家四处找入口时,忽然听见班长说:咦,门口有张纸,写着啥。。。xiaoguo...啊?改期到2月9号?

​大家都傻眼了,果然门口有张纸!果然改期了呀!

​大家纷纷觉得不可思议,咋还改期了,我们没收到通知呀?!

​我也点头,是呀,大家都没收到通知嘛!咦,好像有啥不对劲?

​哦,票是我帮大家买的,难不成email只发给我了?😱😱

​于是我一通找,终于在我收垃圾邮件的信箱里发现3天前给我发的改期E-mail.我的天呀,我根本没看呀!原来是我给大家摆了一道!

​我惴惴不安地告诉大家,大家竟然没扁我一顿,要知道大家都是紧赶慢赶地赶着进城的,大仙羔羊还强迫他们的小孩翘课呢。。。😱😱

大家实在没有预料到煮熟的鸭子都会飞的。大仙还很平静地说:我今天还search一下城里有啥event的,一看根本没有xiaoguo,还想:嗯,太小众了吧,没事。。。🤦🤦

看来不止我瞎!🤦🤦

​看表演不成,我提议请大家喝咖啡,可是找第一家竟然8点不到就关门了。第二间羔羊说100%肯定有!于是大家都紧跟着她的脚步一通找,最后发现这100%肯定有的星巴巴变成了一张纸--关张了!

​哎,最后一群人回到我们晚上吃饭的地方继续喝东西聊天。

​因为是我对不起大家,请大家喝东西赔罪,70同学一看就说你请的也太便宜了吧。。。哎,就连这个麦当当都是一通好找才找到的呀!

​最后喝到9点,班嫂来和我们见面,毕竟太久没见了!

​哈哈,虽然show没看成,可是人一个不漏都见到了呀!🤣🤣

虽然脱口秀没看成,可是我们照样笑个不停,能见到老朋友,真开心😸😸

临走前,女士们在凌乱的food court里合影了一张,纪念一下。

回家把这世纪乌龙大记事告诉70,问他是不是很难以接受,70云淡风轻地说:没有呀。发生在你身上一定也不奇怪呀🤦🤦

哎,不要这样一针见血好不好😞😞

其实我们还算幸运的了,加拿大其他城市都被取消了,多伦多原来两场也只剩下我们改期的那场。美国也有不少城市的取消了,不知道到底发生了什么事,为啥这么大面积取消呀?

后来班长给我们看了笑果微博的帖子,才知道表演的演员变多了,表演时间也变长了。不过大仙最想看的杨笠好像因为签证问题来不了,可惜!

不过还好,我喜欢的小鹿还在,还加了我喜欢的毛豆!!开心!😊😊

2022年11月20日星期日

玩游戏 (2022)

我承认我还挺爱玩游戏的,而且容易上瘾。
最近几次玩游戏都氪金了一下,例如Decor 和Epic Heroes (Save the Animal) 
玩游戏太容易上瘾了,最近玩Epic Heroes不单止氪金,还因为玩得时间长,弄得脖子、手腕都落下毛病,不应该呀!
其实玩这个Epic Heroes我还挺认真的,还做笔记,走迷宫还画了一下地图。
-.note.-

-.地图1.-

-.地图2.-

雪季到了,把游戏删掉了,要专心滑雪了。
特此发帖纪念一下。





2022年9月5日星期一

薅羊毛薅到宝,Top Gun 2 Marwick好好看 (2022)

9月3日是National Cinema Day, 据说全国电影票3刀一张,赶紧薅了两张羊毛。

原本想看Top Gun 2 iMax, 可惜两人一起的只剩下前面几排了,只好买了regular. 入场后买了杯ice tea, 6刀+,比我两张电影票还贵😓😓

​Top Gun 2 太燃了,感觉比1还好看,看得我紧张S了。明明都知道是套路了,还被生生套路了。因为太好看了,剧终的时候竟然全场掌声雷动,吓我一跳,现在看电影还要鼓掌的?😂😂

​沙滩打球那段,我口水都流下来了,这么多鲜肉横飞,真的好吗?BGM也好好听,看傻了。
​其实年轻的时候很喜欢汤哥的,颜值就是正义啊。后来他加入邪教就无感了,感觉不爱的关键是汤哥变老汤了。。。不过老汤真是没得说,60几的人,身材保持得这么好,还那么拼,我难道又重新路转粉?[色][色]


​看完电影,去吃了个意餐,难吃!
一开始,点的这个cocktail 香味挺特别的,可是喝着喝着就觉得满口都是香精的味道。 不过最后杯底是几个小果,一咬就破,满口都是果汁,还是挺好玩的。


这个Garden Salad太酸了,辣椒又太辣:

我点的这个海鲜意面真是奇葩,从来没吃过这么齁咸的musel,连人形垃圾桶70同学都连连摇头说难吃:

70同学点的这个也好不到哪里去,那鱼一点味道都没有。而整盘都是油,真是高钠高油,怎么不健康怎么来呀!!😱😱

周日晚上我们又重温了一下Top Gun 1,看来1真的没有2好看哦,太老套了。不过阿汤哥真是帅S了,慢慢的骨胶原呀,我和70同学都惊叹阿汤哥的美貌!

幸亏拉着70同学去看了Top Gun 2!

2022年6月2日星期四

关于Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard Civil Lawsuit 的观影感受 (2022)

关注Johnny Depp 和Amber Heard的诽谤官司有两周的时间了,而这场经历了1个多月的诉讼也终于迎来大结局。。。

鉴于平日的我也不算太关注娱乐圈的8卦,那为什么我会这么关注这次的民事诉讼呢?
也许是很好奇男人是如何成为家庭暴力的受害者的,毕竟这和我们的认知非常不同,看了些文章,还是有点被JD打动的。
还有这次诉讼是现场直播,全世界人民都在吃瓜,网上有太多的视频,很难让你忽略。
最吸引我的还是看律师如何为自己的client fight,简直是斗智斗勇,比电视剧还好看。

偶然的机会,发现一个YouTube博主“好机车”,说一口地道的英文和台湾话,视频主要是英文的,有繁体中文字幕,把我听不懂的英文都清楚地解释了,而且时长把握地非常好,十多分钟,还非常勤快,日更!非常方便我追剧!

其实心里还是会心痛JD两秒,身为吃瓜群众,和全世界一起吃瓜,看着JD把自己以及和AH的所有不堪的事无巨细地展露给全世界,想想都觉得伤感。

本来希望周五(May 27)Jury能达成 Unanimous Verdict,可是愿望落空。而且由于周一是Memorial Day,Jury周二才能重新开始deliberation,运气好的话,周二就有结果,运气不好的话,最迟周四才会出结果。

周二等了一天没有结果,周三中午的时候忽然看见中学校友群有人说周三下午三点EST会出结果,这才发现原来吃瓜的不止我一个,身边还有不少人也在关注。

周三下午终于迎来了大家翘首以盼的Unanimous Verdict,大家一起激动起来。

看了好机车的视频,就知道JD要告赢实在太难了,他的lawsuit一共有3个statements,每个statement都有几个condition,每个condition都得回答Yes,他才能算赢。反之AH的counter lawsuite也一样。
下面这两个视频是好机车关于这场诉讼的取胜条件:
整理如下:
Question
1. This special verdict form includes each of the statements on which John C. Depp, II, bases his claim of defamation against Amber Heard. Answer the questions in accordance with the Court's instructions.
As to this statement appearing in the online op-ed, entitled "Amber Heard: I spoke up against sexual violence and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change" in the Washington Post's online edition:
"I spoke up against sexual violence and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change."
1(a). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven all the elements of defamation?
Has Mr. Depp proven by a greater weight of the evidence that:
The statement was made or published by Ms. Heard?
The statement was about Mr. Depp?
The statement was false?
The statement has a defamatory implication about Mr. Depp?
The defamatory implication was designed and intended by Ms. Heard?
Due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than Mr. Depp?
1(b). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Ms. Heard acted with actual malice?
2. As to this statement appearing in the op-ed entitled "A Transformative Moment For Women" in the Washington Post's print edition and the online op-ed "Amber Heard. I spoke up against sexual violence--and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change in the Washington Post's online edition:
"Then two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture's wrath for women who speak out."
2(a). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven all the elements of defamation?
Has Mr. Depp proven by a greater weight of the evidence that:
The statement was made or published by Ms. Heard?
The statement was about Mr. Depp?
The statement was false?
The statement has a defamatory implication about Mr. Depp?
The defamatory implication was designed and intended by Ms. Heard?
Due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than Mr. Depp?
2(b). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Ms. Heard acted with actual malice?
3. As to this statement appearing in the op-ed entitled "A Transformative Moment For Women" in the Washington Post's print edition and the online op-ed "Amber Heard: I spoke up against sexual violence and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change in the Washington Post's online edition:
"I had the rare vantage point of seeing, in real time, how institutions protect men accused of abuse."
3(a). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven all the elements of defamation?
Has Mr. Depp proven by a greater weight of the evidence that:
The statement was made or published by Ms. Heard?
The statement was about Mr. Depp?
The statement was false?
The statement has a defamatory implication about Mr. Depp?
The defamatory implication was designed and intended by Ms. Heard?
Due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than Mr. Depp?
3(b). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Ms. Heard acted with actual malice?
4. As against Amber Heard, state the amount of compensatory damages, if any, you believe John C. Depp, II has proven, by a greater weight of the evidence, that he is entitled to recover:
We, the Jury, award compensatory damages in the amount of $_______
5. As against Amber Heard state the amount of punitive damages, if any, to which you find John C. Depp, II is entitled to recover: 
We, the Jury, award punitive damages in the amount of $________
1. As to this statement appearing in the April 8, 2020 online edition of The Daily Mail:
"Amber Heard and her friends in the media use fake sexual violence allegations as both a sword and shield, depending on their needs. They have selected some of her sexual violence hoax 'facts as the sword, inflicting them on the public and Mr. Depp."
1(a). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven all the elements of defamation?
Has Ms. Heard proven by a greater weight of the evidence that: 
Mr. Waldman, while acting as an agent for Mr. Depp, made or published the statement? 
The statement was about Ms. Heard? 
The statement was seen by someone other than Ms. Heard? 
The statement was false? 
1(b). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by Mr. Waldman was made with actual malice? 
2. As to this statement appearing in the April 27, 2020 online edition of The Daily Mail:
“Quite simply this was an ambush, a hoax. They set Mr. Depp up by calling the cops but the first attempt didn't do the trick. The officers came to the penthouses, thoroughly searched and interviewed, and left after seeing no damage to face or property. So Amber and her friends spilled a little wine and roughed the place up, got their stories straight under the direction of a lawyer and publicist, and then placed a second call to 911."
2(a). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven all the elements of defamation?
Has Ms. Heard proven by a greater weight of the evidence that: 
Mr. Waldman, while acting as an agent for Mr. Depp, made or published the statement? 
The statement was about Ms. Heard? 
The statement was seen by someone other than Ms. Heard? 
The statement was false? 
2(b). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by Mr. Waldman was made with actual malice? 
3. As to this statement appearing in the April 27, 2020 online edition of The Daily Mail:
"We have reached the beginning of the end of Ms. Heard's abuse hoax against Johnny Depp."
3(a). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven all the elements of defamation?
Has Ms. Heard proven by a greater weight of the evidence that: 
Mr. Waldman, while acting as an agent for Mr. Depp, made or published the statement? 
The statement was about Ms. Heard? 
The statement was seen by someone other than Ms. Heard? 
The statement was false? 
3(b). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by Mr. Waldman was made with actual malice? 
4. As against John C. Depp, II, state the amount of compensatory damages, if any, you believe Amber Heard has proven, by a greater weight of the evidence, that she is entitled to recover: 
We, the Jury, award compensatory damages in the amount of $_______
5. As against John C. Depp, II, state the amount of punitive damages, if any, you to which you find Amber Heard is entitled to recover: 
We, the Jury, award punitive damages in the amount of $____________

因为条件必须全部符合,所以其实我心里对JD能否赢是十分悲观的。

网上还有说:很大几率就是JD和AH都赢,那就太惨了,JD赢了拿50M,AH赢了可是拿100M,那真是太便宜她了!!

也是关注了这场诉讼我才知道,在美国的司法里,
  • 在刑事诉讼里,Jury只负责判断guilty or not,法官负责量刑。
  • 而在民事诉讼里,Jury不单止负责判断yes or no,还负责裁决damage award。
在宣布verdict的时候,大家听了这么多yes no,估计都很懵逼。幸好我都翻出了文字版,是NBC的“Johnny Depp-Amber Heard Trial: What Did Jurors Consider for a Verdict?”,截图如下:
-.by NBC.-

所以就是说JD的3个statements都胜诉了,AH的3个statements只赢了一个,最后Jury判给JD15M,给AH2M。不过根据州最高的Punitive Award是35K,所以最后判给JD的是10.35M,而不是15M。

好了,追了这么久的剧终于迎来大结局,还是大团圆结局,正义得到彰显,太开心了。

不过追了这么久的剧,还是需要好好写篇观影感受的,​有好几个点想说:

  1. AH就是家暴者,这么蛇蝎心肠的人不能赢
  2. 希望AH的例子不要给被家暴的女生制作更多麻烦。Abusers就是abuser, 无论男女。
  3. JD本身也有很多问题呀,嗑药,酗酒。。。他发起酒疯也很可怕呀,女生也会害怕的,不过更像是精神上的施暴。
  4. 大家选边无可非议,但是硬是把JD和女神律师搞CP就太一厢情愿了吧。还有骂AH的律师的,人家也是做自己的工作而已,人身攻击就不好了。
  5. 真的不能以貌取人呀,天使的面孔,蛇蝎的心肠。;海盗的外表,温柔的内心。。。
  6. JD待朋友真是没得说的,简直是别人家的朋友。。。(看看他是怎么帮助Isaac Baruch,还有bodyguard 的证词-$5000? he gave more than that...)
  7. AH真的很美呀,演技真烂呀,太用力了。
当初看见AH 2016的视频,觉得她就是无辜的小白兔,如果不是早就知道她的歹毒,肯定就会被带偏的。
-.无辜小白兔look.-

最后说些花絮:

  • 我最喜欢的证人是TMZ狗仔队证人Morgan Tremaine。看他怼AH的律师Elaine太爽了——(你说我是为了曝光才来作证的?)那我也可以这样说你呀,你就是为了曝光才做AH的律师的吧!🤣🤣🤣
  • 据说如果AH不提Kate Moss的话,JD这边是不能让她出庭的(别问我为什么呀)。所以当时一听到Kate Moss的名字,JD这边的律师团都开心坏了,Ben还做了个yes的手势🤣🤣

 这几年被选中做陪审团两次,每次都被我以语言不行拒绝了。工作生活上英文没有问题,但是面对法律上的就不行了。如果连理解都有问题,怎么能对被告原告做出公平、正确的裁决呢?!为了公平,还是拒绝好些。

吃完瓜了,没有失落,为JD开心。希望AH不要再冒充受害者了,收手吧!