- 要不我就是看了小说,自己脑补的场景
- 要不就是我看了某些YouTuber的评论,然后几个电影揉搓在一起导致的记忆混乱
猫眼看世界。。。
人生匆匆几十年,有无数的片段、感概,我都希望记录下来。
因为数年以后,我再重新回味,都会被往日的片段所惊讶(无论好、坏),所以我不愿意让时光冲淡我的记忆,我希望把一切美好留住。
2024年3月4日星期一
记忆偏差——看日剧《为了N》有感 (2024)
2023年4月15日星期六
翻车的煎汤圆 (2023)
唉,人家的悲喜真是不相通的,大家花式点赞,没事,为博你们红颜/蓝颜一笑!总结了一下:水放多了,而且我们的汤圆是小个头的,人家的汤圆肥肥胖胖的。
还有,这个不是我要卖的关子,不是下集。别等了,散了吧。。。
2023年4月14日星期五
繁忙的一天
2023年2月9日星期四
看笑果2023年北美巡演
现场不让用手机,一进门就放进个小口袋里。大意了,别看它人畜无害的样子,放进去手机就再出不来了,班长给打电话都完全没法听。
据说现场有3000多观众,应该有8、9成的入座率了。第一次在多伦多看到这么多华人[偷笑]这是北美巡演的最后一场了,最可惜的是万人迷杨笠没来,认识的人喜欢看脱口秀的都想看她,估计她的线下一定更大胆更好玩,可惜了。
中场抽了5个幸运儿可以带1-2个朋友去后台跟演员们合影,我们没抽到😒😒
大家笑开心了,约会下次继续看😊😊
2023年1月22日星期日
乌龙大了 (2023)
哎,今天乌龙大了,简直算得上乌龙大记事,非得要发朋友圈纪念一下。
去年班长发朋友圈问有谁要去看笑果在多伦多的表演,我和大仙、羔羊都报名参加,当时我还积极地帮大家抢票。我非常给力的,为大家抢下了1月19的4张票。
和同学们约好在火车站集合,先吃个饭,然后再愉快去看表演。
大家太久没见了,有几年了吧,以至于聊得太开心。幸亏我还人间清醒,一看表都7点半了,连忙拉着大家往剧院赶。
大家一起有说有笑地来到剧院门前,班长嘀咕了一下:这也太小众了吧,怎么门口乌灯黑火的呀,门都打不开。。。
大家连忙点头同意--真的很小众![无语][无语]
正当大家四处找入口时,忽然听见班长说:咦,门口有张纸,写着啥。。。xiaoguo...啊?改期到2月9号?
大家都傻眼了,果然门口有张纸!果然改期了呀!
大家纷纷觉得不可思议,咋还改期了,我们没收到通知呀?!
我也点头,是呀,大家都没收到通知嘛!咦,好像有啥不对劲?
哦,票是我帮大家买的,难不成email只发给我了?😱😱
于是我一通找,终于在我收垃圾邮件的信箱里发现3天前给我发的改期E-mail.我的天呀,我根本没看呀!原来是我给大家摆了一道!
我惴惴不安地告诉大家,大家竟然没扁我一顿,要知道大家都是紧赶慢赶地赶着进城的,大仙羔羊还强迫他们的小孩翘课呢。。。😱😱
大家实在没有预料到煮熟的鸭子都会飞的。大仙还很平静地说:我今天还search一下城里有啥event的,一看根本没有xiaoguo,还想:嗯,太小众了吧,没事。。。🤦🤦
看来不止我瞎!🤦🤦
看表演不成,我提议请大家喝咖啡,可是找第一家竟然8点不到就关门了。第二间羔羊说100%肯定有!于是大家都紧跟着她的脚步一通找,最后发现这100%肯定有的星巴巴变成了一张纸--关张了!
哎,最后一群人回到我们晚上吃饭的地方继续喝东西聊天。
因为是我对不起大家,请大家喝东西赔罪,70同学一看就说你请的也太便宜了吧。。。哎,就连这个麦当当都是一通好找才找到的呀!
最后喝到9点,班嫂来和我们见面,毕竟太久没见了!
哈哈,虽然show没看成,可是人一个不漏都见到了呀!🤣🤣
虽然脱口秀没看成,可是我们照样笑个不停,能见到老朋友,真开心😸😸
临走前,女士们在凌乱的food court里合影了一张,纪念一下。
回家把这世纪乌龙大记事告诉70,问他是不是很难以接受,70云淡风轻地说:没有呀。发生在你身上一定也不奇怪呀🤦🤦
哎,不要这样一针见血好不好😞😞
其实我们还算幸运的了,加拿大其他城市都被取消了,多伦多原来两场也只剩下我们改期的那场。美国也有不少城市的取消了,不知道到底发生了什么事,为啥这么大面积取消呀?
后来班长给我们看了笑果微博的帖子,才知道表演的演员变多了,表演时间也变长了。不过大仙最想看的杨笠好像因为签证问题来不了,可惜!
不过还好,我喜欢的小鹿还在,还加了我喜欢的毛豆!!开心!😊😊
2022年11月20日星期日
玩游戏 (2022)
2022年9月5日星期一
薅羊毛薅到宝,Top Gun 2 Marwick好好看 (2022)
2022年6月2日星期四
关于Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard Civil Lawsuit 的观影感受 (2022)
Question |
1. This special verdict form includes each of the statements on which John C. Depp, II, bases his claim of defamation against Amber Heard. Answer the questions in accordance with the Court's instructions. As to this statement appearing in the online op-ed, entitled "Amber Heard: I spoke up against sexual violence and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change" in the Washington Post's online edition: "I spoke up against sexual violence and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change." |
1(a). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven all the elements of defamation? |
Has Mr. Depp proven by a greater weight of the evidence that: |
The statement was made or published by Ms. Heard? |
The statement was about Mr. Depp? |
The statement was false? |
The statement has a defamatory implication about Mr. Depp? |
The defamatory implication was designed and intended by Ms. Heard? |
Due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than Mr. Depp? |
1(b). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Ms. Heard acted with actual malice? |
2. As to this statement appearing in the op-ed entitled "A Transformative Moment For Women" in the Washington Post's print edition and the online op-ed "Amber Heard. I spoke up against sexual violence--and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change in the Washington Post's online edition: "Then two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture's wrath for women who speak out." |
2(a). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven all the elements of defamation? |
Has Mr. Depp proven by a greater weight of the evidence that: |
The statement was made or published by Ms. Heard? |
The statement was about Mr. Depp? |
The statement was false? |
The statement has a defamatory implication about Mr. Depp? |
The defamatory implication was designed and intended by Ms. Heard? |
Due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than Mr. Depp? |
2(b). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Ms. Heard acted with actual malice? |
3. As to this statement appearing in the op-ed entitled "A Transformative Moment For Women" in the Washington Post's print edition and the online op-ed "Amber Heard: I spoke up against sexual violence and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change in the Washington Post's online edition: "I had the rare vantage point of seeing, in real time, how institutions protect men accused of abuse." |
3(a). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven all the elements of defamation? |
Has Mr. Depp proven by a greater weight of the evidence that: |
The statement was made or published by Ms. Heard? |
The statement was about Mr. Depp? |
The statement was false? |
The statement has a defamatory implication about Mr. Depp? |
The defamatory implication was designed and intended by Ms. Heard? |
Due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than Mr. Depp? |
3(b). Do you find that Mr. Depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Ms. Heard acted with actual malice? |
4. As against Amber Heard, state the amount of compensatory damages, if any, you believe John C. Depp, II has proven, by a greater weight of the evidence, that he is entitled to recover: |
We, the Jury, award compensatory damages in the amount of $_______ |
5. As against Amber Heard state the amount of punitive damages, if any, to which you find John C. Depp, II is entitled to recover: |
We, the Jury, award punitive damages in the amount of $________ |
1. As to this statement appearing in the April 8, 2020 online edition of The Daily Mail: "Amber Heard and her friends in the media use fake sexual violence allegations as both a sword and shield, depending on their needs. They have selected some of her sexual violence hoax 'facts as the sword, inflicting them on the public and Mr. Depp." |
1(a). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven all the elements of defamation? |
Has Ms. Heard proven by a greater weight of the evidence that: |
Mr. Waldman, while acting as an agent for Mr. Depp, made or published the statement? |
The statement was about Ms. Heard? |
The statement was seen by someone other than Ms. Heard? |
The statement was false? |
1(b). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by Mr. Waldman was made with actual malice? |
2. As to this statement appearing in the April 27, 2020 online edition of The Daily Mail: “Quite simply this was an ambush, a hoax. They set Mr. Depp up by calling the cops but the first attempt didn't do the trick. The officers came to the penthouses, thoroughly searched and interviewed, and left after seeing no damage to face or property. So Amber and her friends spilled a little wine and roughed the place up, got their stories straight under the direction of a lawyer and publicist, and then placed a second call to 911." |
2(a). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven all the elements of defamation? |
Has Ms. Heard proven by a greater weight of the evidence that: |
Mr. Waldman, while acting as an agent for Mr. Depp, made or published the statement? |
The statement was about Ms. Heard? |
The statement was seen by someone other than Ms. Heard? |
The statement was false? |
2(b). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by Mr. Waldman was made with actual malice? |
3. As to this statement appearing in the April 27, 2020 online edition of The Daily Mail: "We have reached the beginning of the end of Ms. Heard's abuse hoax against Johnny Depp." |
3(a). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven all the elements of defamation? |
Has Ms. Heard proven by a greater weight of the evidence that: |
Mr. Waldman, while acting as an agent for Mr. Depp, made or published the statement? |
The statement was about Ms. Heard? |
The statement was seen by someone other than Ms. Heard? |
The statement was false? |
3(b). Do you find that Ms. Heard has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the statement by Mr. Waldman was made with actual malice? |
4. As against John C. Depp, II, state the amount of compensatory damages, if any, you believe Amber Heard has proven, by a greater weight of the evidence, that she is entitled to recover: |
We, the Jury, award compensatory damages in the amount of $_______ |
5. As against John C. Depp, II, state the amount of punitive damages, if any, you to which you find Amber Heard is entitled to recover: |
We, the Jury, award punitive damages in the amount of $____________ |
- 在刑事诉讼里,Jury只负责判断guilty or not,法官负责量刑。
- 而在民事诉讼里,Jury不单止负责判断yes or no,还负责裁决damage award。
- AH就是家暴者,这么蛇蝎心肠的人不能赢
- 希望AH的例子不要给被家暴的女生制作更多麻烦。Abusers就是abuser, 无论男女。
- JD本身也有很多问题呀,嗑药,酗酒。。。他发起酒疯也很可怕呀,女生也会害怕的,不过更像是精神上的施暴。
- 大家选边无可非议,但是硬是把JD和女神律师搞CP就太一厢情愿了吧。还有骂AH的律师的,人家也是做自己的工作而已,人身攻击就不好了。
- 真的不能以貌取人呀,天使的面孔,蛇蝎的心肠。;海盗的外表,温柔的内心。。。
- JD待朋友真是没得说的,简直是别人家的朋友。。。(看看他是怎么帮助Isaac Baruch,还有bodyguard 的证词-$5000? he gave more than that...)
- AH真的很美呀,演技真烂呀,太用力了。
- 我最喜欢的证人是TMZ狗仔队证人Morgan Tremaine。看他怼AH的律师Elaine太爽了——(你说我是为了曝光才来作证的?)那我也可以这样说你呀,你就是为了曝光才做AH的律师的吧!🤣🤣🤣
- 据说如果AH不提Kate Moss的话,JD这边是不能让她出庭的(别问我为什么呀)。所以当时一听到Kate Moss的名字,JD这边的律师团都开心坏了,Ben还做了个yes的手势🤣🤣
这几年被选中做陪审团两次,每次都被我以语言不行拒绝了。工作生活上英文没有问题,但是面对法律上的就不行了。如果连理解都有问题,怎么能对被告原告做出公平、正确的裁决呢?!为了公平,还是拒绝好些。
吃完瓜了,没有失落,为JD开心。希望AH不要再冒充受害者了,收手吧!